Fotograf: Abertish@flickr 

The New Paradigm: Our natural state

In order to recreate a state that is not good, one must first of all acknowledge that there is a problem. In psychology, there is a phenomenon Freud called displacement. This means that a person who realized an unpleasant fact that he can reasonably handle, choose to suppress or "forget" it. Earnings will be that the individual does not consciously have to confront the immense discomfort or anxiety producing things to see. The downside is that the person develops a form of neurosis because of the internal voltage and power that is spent to keep the nasty hidden. To dissolve the emotional knots so you need to raise awareness and address the difficult and traumatic feelings.

For many years, have apparently been playing on people's feelings of guilt and fear of suffering and death to get them to act in accordance with the elite's desire. On a larger scale, there was / is the threat of God's wrath for those who do not "did / does as the words", the next scale of the threat posed by those in power of non-payment, imprisonment or death, then the parents and the immediate surroundings and the threat of loss of love and fellowship .

Man is a herd creature and the fear of being rejected out of the group of the Community makes the vast majority comply. We are not created to live in solitude, or alienated from other people, but needs a social context where we can interact with and reflect ourselves in each other. Therefore, usually a big self-esteem and inner strength to dare to challenge the prevailing dogmas of the group, society and world.

Already in the 1600s argued the philosopher Thomas Hobbes that humans are cruel, selfish and greedy for power and need elite hard rule to be kept in check. In the 1700s, so said the French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau, that man is born good. Other thinkers, such as John Locke, believed that man is born as a blank slate. Research shows that we are born with specific traits, and that most people are not willing to walk over corpses. However there is of course obvious exceptions.

Within evolutionspyskologin studies the behavior and psychology of humans and other primates and suggests that our behavior is largely a result of genetic adaptations developed to overcome barriers in the historic environment. Professor Steven Pinker of Harvard believes that the role of environment in personality is exaggerated. He claims that our personlighetesdrag to more than nine-tenths due to biological inheritance from millions of years of African samlarliv, the rest is random and the environment.

I usually argue that man is basically is a curious, creative and life-loving creature, and that our conflict-prone as soon as relates to that we are in conflict with ourselves because we live in an environment that in many respects will corrode our nervous system. When it comes down to it, we are often inclined to assist each other in difficult moments. Just look what happens when a major disaster occurs, most people are prepared to help in any way, at least if they are asked.

It appears that it is only when we are exposed to stress, (which is often subconscious) and because of fear and lack of control over our lives, we tend to become cynical and aggressive. When triggered the reptilian brain and our lowest instincts going and like the predator bites us in self-defense or attack automatically and cut to our environment in various ways.

Professor Pinker says that between three and four percent of U.S. men are psychopaths. These individuals have a genetic mutation that makes them lack the most basic human capabilities: empathy. Therefore, they are manipulative, irresponsible, selfish, lying and lack of guilt. Paradoxically, they also often socially successful, leading leads to question why not all become psychopaths?

Lasse Berg, author of the book "Kalahari Dawn - How man became man", who studied African tribes as the truth the people who live in the Stone Age, believes that the explanation may be that this move was very rare among the old gathers the people because the groups receiving too many psychopaths lost the ability to cooperate:

"Maybe they have become more in later-day hierarchical societies in which this personality makes it easier to walk over corpses on the way to the top. The capacity for goodness, selected over millions of years of equal group life, may not have the same evolutionary advantages of the hierarchical societies, we have just invented . A psychopath, however, are more likely than others to advance, although it is often disastrous for the organization. "

Furthermore, he writes:

"In private industry, this is now a much-publicized problems. One plausible hypothesis is that the psychos are also overrepresented in the top of the other organizations and organs of society where there is power."

The latter is fully consistent with the theory I operate, namely that those who have power over the world and dictate the conditions in terms of the rest of humanity, are just psychopaths and that's why we continue to spend trillions on military means, while we know that 30 000 children a day die from hunger and half the planet's population lives on less than 2 dollars a day.

In light of this will of course claims that the "powers that be would never kill 3000 of its own citizens" to argue against the thesis that 9/11-dådet was not the result of an old man in a cave whose cronies with little flight experience ruled the three Boeing planes with perfect precision in the three buildings in the country with the world's most advanced intelligence
and air forces, of course, naive.

Today we know that the U.S. had cracked the Japanese code in World War II and knew they were headed for Pearl Harbor. Then killed over 2500 people and they were sacrificed to the U.S. government would engage the public in the war. 34 years later, in 1975, was Japan's emperor Hirohito, who enthusiastically fought on the side of Hitler and the Nazis against the Allies during World War II and accepted the Pearl Harbor attack, on a state visit to the United States and was received with open arms by the rulers.

We also know that the OSS, the forerunner of the CIA, took over both the Nazi officers that Reinhard Gehlen, and several Nazi scientists, including Werner Von Braun, a former colonel in the SS, to the U.S., while the Vatican assisted the Nazis in their flight to include South America.

We also know that U.S. and British underättelstjänst 1958 began Operation Gladio, a near 20-year-old business that consisted of secret guerrilla troops all over Europe as the Cold War would act as a "protector" against communist influence. The core of the plan were different forms of terrorism against civilians. With the help of right-wing organizations, a series of attacks in which hundreds of innocent people died.

We also know that in 2003 it admitted Robert McNamara, who was U.S. Secretary of Defense during the 60th century, in an interview that the so-called Tonkin incident in 1964, which was used to justify the U.S. war in Vietnam, never happened at all.

Such data sets much of what we learned on the head. For years we have been fed by well-meaning teachers in the school, entustiastiska journalists in the media and "educated" academics in the debate, sofas, to the conflicts we see around the world are the result of unfortunate political circumstances and coincidences. "Shit Happens"!

Rarely hear anyone even breathes a suggestion that we served on lies by those in power, that war is very profitable for the big bankers and miltärindustrin and that it, not least in connection with terror, also used as förevänding to transform communities and impose big brother laws to such as FRA or facistioida laws that the Patriot Act.

Frightened of various atrocities, uncritically reported in the press, nodding the unwary citizen and then says that this is probably good anyway. Gradually stripped us of our human rights without UTTER A SOUND when we learned to be obedient.

Rather than repress us the unpleasant fact that we have become cogs in a soulless machine that runs contrary to our nervous system and console ourselves with gadgets, fast food, sweets, drugs and other diversionary things in an attempt to hold out on the materialistic slave farm in the global board game in which elite moves around and pushes out people at will in their power games.

Instead, they have managed to convince us that this is something quite natural, and if someone puts a foot outside the fold and maintain an uncomfortable or even revolutionary idea, so is the other fast there and "rebukes" "puckot". In particular, legitimate, this will be the "correct" can refer to academic education as a basis of "sound" and "realistic" worldview, in contrast to the "Sesame Street" and "Truth fools" who in their eyes are "lonely, ignorant and pathetic buffoons "in their attempts to understand the world. To the extent that these "foil hats" find fellowship, it is just as other "Stoller" trapped in a "conspiratorial soup".

It seems that we need a new paradigm in the way they think, see and relate to our world. A prerequisite for this new paradigm is that we begin to perceive and dare to look at what really happened and is done on the world stage and that we believe in ourselves and humanity as such. Lasse Berg maintains that man is basically good. His observations of the truth the people show that they are both empathetic and helpful. He also tells us that when the anthropologist Marjorie Shostak examined self-image of san-women of all ages, she discovered that they saw themselves as naturally desirable and beautiful and that they perceived their own personality as well and full. "That is probably our natural state out," says Berg.

If this is our natural urtillstånd, which I think it is, then it is perhaps time that we try to recapture that state.

Av Anders Hansson 06 May 2011 11:04